logoalt Hacker News

Anthropic officially bans using subscription auth for third party use

607 pointsby theahurayesterday at 2:52 AM736 commentsview on HN

Comments

jongjongyesterday at 7:35 AM

I have no issues with this. Anthropic did a great job with Claude Code.

It's a little bit sleazy as a business model to try to wedge one's self between Claude and its users.

OpenAI acquiring OpenClaw gives me bad vibes. How did OpenClaw gain so much traction so quickly? It doesn't seem organic.

I definitely feel much more aligned with Anthropic as a company. What they do seems more focused, meritocratic, organic and genuine.

OpenAI essentially appropriated all their current IP from the people... They basically gutted the non-profit and stole its IP. Then sold a huge chunk to Microsoft... Yes, they literally sold the IP they stole to Microsoft, in broad daylight. Then they used media spin to make it sound like they appropriated it from Elon because Elon donated a few millions... But Elon got his tax deduction! The public footed the bill for those deductions... The IP belonged to the non-profit; to the public, not Elon, nor any of the donors. I mean let's not even mention Suchir Balaji, the OpenAI researcher who supposedly "committed suicide" after trying to warn everyone about the stolen IP.

OpenAI is clearly trying to slander Anthropic, trying to present themselves as the good guys after their OpenClaw acquisition and really rubbing it in all over HN... Over which they have much influence.

jamiemallersyesterday at 3:03 PM

[dead]

show 2 replies
anvevoiceyesterday at 4:49 AM

[dead]

littlebrutusyesterday at 2:21 PM

[dead]

johnjames87yesterday at 1:32 PM

[dead]

exabrialyesterday at 4:00 AM

The number one thing we need is cheap abundant decentralized clean energy, and these things are laughable.

Unfortunately neither political party can get all of the above.

show 1 reply
mkw5053yesterday at 3:22 AM

And I just bought my mac mini this morning... Sorry everyone

show 1 reply
theptipyesterday at 3:49 AM

I think this is shortsighted.

The markets value recurring subscription revenue at something like 10x “one-off” revenue, Anthropic is leaving a lot of enterprise value on the table with this approach.

In practice this approach forces AI apps to pay Anthropic for tokens, and then bill their customers a subscription. Customers could bring their own API key but it’s sketchy to put that into every app you want to try, and consumers aren’t going to use developer tools. And many categories of free app are simply excluded, which could in aggregate drive a lot more demand for subscriptions.

If Anthropic is worried about quota, seems they could set lower caps for third-party subscription usage? Still better than forcing API keys.

(Maybe this is purely about displacing other IDE products, rather than a broader market play.)

show 3 replies