logoalt Hacker News

OpenAI – How to delete your account

1788 pointsby carlosrgyesterday at 10:41 AM339 commentsview on HN

Comments

IAmGraydonyesterday at 2:36 PM

For those who are having trouble deleting their account, just go to Settings > Account > Manage > Cancel Subscription. No need to delete the account all together. Just stop paying them.

hilliardfarmeryesterday at 2:25 PM

Deleted.

restersyesterday at 12:45 PM

We've seen the Trump administration disregard so many laws already, and abuse power so excessively, that Sam's comments come off as exceptionally and willfully naive, or exceptionally and willfully greedy to the point of truly not caring that OpenAI's technology will undoubtedly be used to break many, many more laws and violate the civil rights or human rights of many, many more people.

For a few months now, ChatGPT 5.x has been somewhat lobotomized on political issues and has appeared to substitute a gpt-4o caliber "fair and balanced" response whenever anything where a reasoning AI would criticize the Trump administration might end up in the response output. Surely that was part of the pitch at some level, and now the deal has been won.

Greg Brockman apparently donated money to Trump, and the whole OpenAI team put on suits and posed for pictures with Donald and behaved officiously before Donald facilitated the $100M "deal" that ended up falling apart later.

The only way authoritarian control could be exerted over AI at scale was to make AI companies dependent on government contracts for survival. OpenAI's fundraise would not have happened without the contract signed, and the money would have gone to Grok or whichever competitor was willing to submit.

Before long much of the reasoning capabilities of models will be neutered, the capacity to inform and to disrupt science and technology will be stripped from the models to preserve the status quo and to preserve authoritarian control.

Silicon Valley pushing for Federal laws preventing states from regulating AI is not just anti-democratic (building software has never been cheaper so of course building compliance with state laws would have been extremely affordable in relative terms). But forced Federal limits on state laws create a monopoly and grant the early winners incumbent status for a while, which is a financial outcome, not a technological or social one.

Enjoy frontier AI while you can, because it will go away. More and more topics will get the lobotomized output, your conversation will be flagged and you will be given a score assessing the level of threat you pose to the regime. This stuff is already in place. Even Claude does it if you ask about Gaza, but a bit of well-reasoned argumentation will convince it. OpenAI's lobotomies are deeper and more insidious.

I call upon OpenAI to follow DeepSeek's lead and open source more models and techniques.

show 1 reply
ck2yesterday at 1:44 PM

Yeah sure right after everyone deletes their X account and stops posting links here

Altman's immorality is theoretical

Musk's is literal, he's murdered a million people by purposely destroying USAID, leaving food and medication already paid for to rot in warehouses

andytrattyesterday at 3:05 PM

all this political activity should get flagged according to HN terms

lvl155yesterday at 12:31 PM

I canceled my subscription though I still have a lot of money in API (which I know they don’t refund). I will sundown and move it all over to Anthropic/Google. It’s pretty clear to me what OAI is doing. Shame on anyone working there selling their souls for a few more pennies.

Shame because Codex was a bit better for me in the past few weeks but not enough to justify spending my money on them.

show 1 reply
mvelbaumyesterday at 12:10 PM

I can't believe that people simply bought into Anthropic's PR messaging. This has nothing to do with "mass surveillance" (which is illegal anyway) or killbots, it's all about Dario wanting to be able to override lawful use:

[0] https://x.com/CardilloSamuel/status/2027536128291528846

[1] https://x.com/UnderSecPD/status/2027353177578783204

[2] https://x.com/zarathustra5150/status/2027616890516889658

I think it's quite rich all these people virtue signaling when: (1) Anthropic (and other labs) committed large scale theft of copyrighted materials to train their models. (2) Anthropic collects large swaths of data on its users (3) Dario seemed to have no issue working to help the CCP: https://x.com/ubuto23/status/2027578089371267201

Also, you must understand that if you support Anthropic, then you should be against Open Source models.

show 1 reply
hktyesterday at 12:03 PM

In the app, account deletion currently errors saying the action can't be started. Hard to believe this is coincidence.

wateralienyesterday at 11:40 AM

Done.

tamimioyesterday at 11:38 AM

I never used openAI, or any other AI except claude casually on some stuff, but until this date never relied on it, hopefully I will keep it that way just like how I never had social media.

segfaultexyesterday at 1:53 PM

Deleted mine months ago. Altman is one of the slimiest tech ceos out there, which is saying something.

davidlorean1985yesterday at 3:55 PM

done.

adverblyyesterday at 11:21 AM

Done

ukblewisyesterday at 2:26 PM

This is utter BS. You’re entitled not agree with a company… but using Hacker News to shout that at the world. Just shitty behaviour

wosinedyesterday at 12:23 PM

Boycott them all. Shit anti-human tech & philosophy.

webdevveryesterday at 11:07 AM

wish oai was publicly traded so i could buy the dip on all this nonsense. the one for musk was super juicy.

show 2 replies
cynicalsecurityyesterday at 12:47 PM

Nope.

curtisblaineyesterday at 11:20 AM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
kopolloyesterday at 11:56 AM

[flagged]

andela4ayesterday at 11:27 AM

[flagged]

heraldgeezeryesterday at 12:27 PM

Why are your panties in a twist?

Do you rather be killed by Chinese AI instead?

show 1 reply
blellyesterday at 12:05 PM

It’s 2026, guys. Stop it with this performative bs. It’s cringe.

show 1 reply
iugtmkbdfil834yesterday at 12:15 PM

I am confused. Nothing has changed ( except, obviously, public perception of things ). Why would openAI be a target to 'punish' now and not other times it transgressed ( especially now that it didn't actually do anything )? Honestly, this crap annoys me more than anything else.

Don't get me wrong. I am personally a personal inference machine advocate, but I kinda accept it may not be a viable path for everyone.

show 1 reply
VladVladikoffyesterday at 1:19 PM

This feels like performative virtue signalling which is really not in the spirit of hacker news.

tzahifadidayesterday at 11:17 AM

What about claude? Don't think they wont be used militarily that is naive...

show 1 reply
findthebugyesterday at 2:12 PM

all what i hear is mimimimi...

guys big tech is playing this game for decades now. what changed? they selling private data, manipulating society, turning children in doom scrolling addicts. facebook, google and others doing this for years an no one cares. i deleted fb and whatsup years ago, 99% of my friends and fam still using it until today.

as long as they can flip some dollars nothing will change and 99% will not delete anything because of 99% are to lazy and give a shit.

rabfyesterday at 1:11 PM

First you want the goverment to regulate AI. Now you want AI companies to regulate the goverment? Personally when I buy something I do whatever I want with it and imagine the DOD feels the same.

show 1 reply
plucyesterday at 12:03 PM

You can't close this box you've opened. I hope saving time on keystrokes was worth your democracy freedom and privacy. I'm gonna have fun watching it get ripped away

show 2 replies
garyrobyesterday at 2:49 PM

"If you delete your account, we will delete your data within 30 days, except we may retain a limited set of data for longer where required or permitted by law."

"where required".... hmm, that seems OK. We don't want to violate the law!

"or permitted".... er...

[I wonder why this comment is being voted down. Do people here think it's NOT OK to comply with the law with respect to retaining data? Or is the reason somehow the opposite of that? Not sure. But my point was that the "where required" clause seems moot if they are going to retain data where "permitted", which in my book, is NOT OK.]