Author of "Careless People" banned from saying anything negative about Meta

[dead]

[dead]

[flagged]

[flagged]

This book is most likely a bunch of lies right? A Meta executive fired for poor performance decides to right a tell all and _surprise_ the people who fired her are all monsters. Why should I take this seriously?

I guess rigor goes out the window when evidence fits your bias...

How do know she's telling the truth? I'm not inclined to give any high level Meta person (current or former) the benefit of the doubt. I haven't read the book, so I don't really know what kind of, like, proof or anything she includes (or could include). Is it just a "trust me not them" thing?