> We can stop reading LLM-generated code just like we don’t read assembly, or bytecode, or transpiled JavaScript; our high-level language source would now be another form of machine code

This is too weird for me. At least with programming languages I can consult the documentation and if the programming language isn’t behaving as documented, it’s obviously a defect and if you’re savvy enough you often have open channels that accept contributions. Can we say the same for Claude or other AI solutions?