logoalt Hacker News

terracattatoday at 4:57 PM3 repliesview on HN

Usually these types of articles are written about things that challenge status quos. I remember reading a lot about Ruby on Rails in the same vein "ruby isn't a real language", "rails is just a collection of scripts", and "you can't build real web apps with it."

If Omarchy is upsetting the Linux establishment as much as this article implies (unclear if this is just a one-off) then it's probably worth a look!


Replies

Aurornistoday at 5:06 PM

> If Omarchy is upsetting the Linux establishment as much as this article implies

It’s not upsetting anyone other than people who like to argue about inconsequential things on social media.

I actually don’t think it would be as popular without all of the manufactured drama and controversy around. Some people (like the parent comment) are drawn to the controversy and feeling of rebellion.

I bet 99% of people do not care if you use it or not. The other 1% just like arguing about other people’s personal preferences for some reason.

show 2 replies
undevelopertoday at 7:01 PM

it's upsetting as money goes to a dotfile config rather than the underlying projects. arch linux is a phenomenal project

whalesaladtoday at 5:01 PM

The upset is due to the imbalance between what omarchy really is and the buzz around it. When your “distro” could be a bash script on a vanilla arch install, is it really worth making a distro?

This is just more perpetuation of the distro fragmentation that doesn’t need to exist.