That’s impressive!
On the sheer performance it’s comparable to Opus ?
Here are my stats (from DeepSeek directly, with a script I wrote). The prices are what equivalent Sonnet usage would have cost, the actual amount I paid was $10. On performance, DeepSeek V4 Pro is comparable to Sonnet for me.
./cost.py amount-2026-5.csv 0.3 3.75 15 input_cache_hit_tokens: 472,971,520 tokens -> $141.8915 input_cache_miss_tokens: 13,299,013 tokens -> $49.8713 output_tokens: 3,334,962 tokens -> $50.0244 cache hit rate: 97.27% (472,971,520/486,270,533) cache miss rate: 2.73% (13,299,013/486,270,533) total: $241.7872
alt Hacker News
Here are my stats (from DeepSeek directly, with a script I wrote). The prices are what equivalent Sonnet usage would have cost, the actual amount I paid was $10. On performance, DeepSeek V4 Pro is comparable to Sonnet for me.
All of this usage was with an OpenCode subagent exclusively.