logoalt Hacker News

IBM Bob

248 pointsby artparyesterday at 12:50 PM279 commentsview on HN

Comments

throwitaway222yesterday at 6:20 PM

They got it wrong - they're showing code in the ad.

ctothyesterday at 5:51 PM

Who're they subcontracting for the Von Neumann probes?

quietsegfaultyesterday at 1:10 PM

I used Bob extensively at an IBM acquisition, it was absolutely dreadful. Bobcoins.

formvoltrontoday at 1:24 AM

Does it write really clean code ala Uncle Bob?

dainiusseyesterday at 3:12 PM

The next step is yandex/nebius "vasya"

show 1 reply
selfawareMammalyesterday at 1:54 PM

The logo, the name... Horrible marketing/branding.

arpanghoshal07yesterday at 5:51 PM

seems like they used claude for this

nielsbotyesterday at 2:57 PM

Should have called it Bob The Builder

mv4yesterday at 6:23 PM

what happened to Watson?

show 1 reply
m_w_yesterday at 1:41 PM

The review that "IBM Bob isn't just another autocomplete tool" tells you everything you need to know about this product. lol.

karim79yesterday at 5:37 PM

Bobcoins. Intriguing.

swiftcoderyesterday at 1:49 PM

At least it's not Clippy?

show 1 reply
lowbloodsugaryesterday at 10:13 PM

Bob the Builder? Right age bracket I guess.

basiswordyesterday at 2:27 PM

Thought this was going to be about Microsoft Bob.[0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

saberienceyesterday at 1:25 PM

This is embarrassing. It would have been better to release nothing than this.

madspindelyesterday at 7:46 PM

Hi Bob! Bob!

TheAtomicyesterday at 6:52 PM

Oh Clippy

DonHopkinsyesterday at 6:25 PM

What do you call an agent with no arms and no legs in the ocean?

show 1 reply
Suracyesterday at 6:34 PM

Clippy the Clip is it's uncle

ltbarcly3yesterday at 5:48 PM

Aww IBM wants to play too. I forgot they were still around.

walrus01yesterday at 1:36 PM

Not to be confused with Microsoft Bob:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

Hypergrapheyesterday at 2:25 PM

Too late ?

antonvsyesterday at 1:22 PM

Should have been IBM Tom, after legendary IBM CEO Thomas J. Watson. But perhaps they didn't want to sully his name.

show 3 replies
Geonodeyesterday at 1:06 PM

I bet this will be as successful as Microsoft Bob.

show 1 reply
taspeotisyesterday at 1:44 PM

Not to shit on their effort or anything, but it looks like a VS Code fork + an agent panel which is very ... late 2024 energy?

h_mirinyesterday at 1:39 PM

Bobalytics

jgbuddyyesterday at 2:43 PM

Lol github copilot 5 years late

show 1 reply
mattmcbrienyesterday at 7:09 PM

their swag too tough

xystyesterday at 2:03 PM

ibm desperately clinging to relevancy by hopping on the LLM bandwagon.

znpyyesterday at 1:28 PM

Lost opportunity to call it Hal

show 2 replies
colordropsyesterday at 8:31 PM

Has any product with an infantilized agent avatar like this ever turned out to be useful or succeed in gaining traction?

yapyapyesterday at 2:06 PM

ibm bob, will help you make slop

self_awarenessyesterday at 1:48 PM

Oh, so we are yet again in the 'Bob' phase?

Maybe this time it'll work.

varispeedyesterday at 1:41 PM

The companies who are hoarding RAM to produce pointless products should be called out. Deprive working class from computing resources to sell some corporate crap. Get fucked.

show 1 reply
gregce10yesterday at 5:54 PM

[flagged]

rdtscyesterday at 2:49 PM

[flagged]

jrfloyesterday at 1:57 PM

So it's just a vscode wrapper around a mystery open weights LLM I'm guessing?

> Can I choose which model Bob uses?

> No. Bob automatically selects the most appropriate language model for each task based on complexity, required capabilities, and cost-efficiency. This intelligent routing ensures you receive high-quality responses while optimizing resource usage.

gilliethefoilyesterday at 2:10 PM

[dead]

skrebbelyesterday at 5:34 PM

[dead]

colesantiagoyesterday at 1:05 PM

I never thought the day that IBM would make complete slop.

But it is IBM after all.

show 1 reply

🔗 View 2 more comments