logoalt Hacker News

Grok 4.7

451 pointsby meetpateltechtoday at 3:50 PM368 commentsview on HN

Comments

elevententoday at 5:22 PM

[flagged]

show 6 replies
toadertoday at 4:23 PM

[flagged]

show 5 replies
jmward01today at 4:34 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
simianwordstoday at 4:10 PM

I guess it’s only my opinion but having used grok for personal chat: it’s by far the worst one amongst Claude, ChatGPT and even Deepseek, Gemini etc.

The personality is bland and it doesn’t work nearly as hard or even tries to help.

show 5 replies
enraged_cameltoday at 5:51 PM

This thing is DOA. They compared 4.7 xhigh to 4.6 high to make it look like it improved. The reality is pretty bad: https://x.com/chetaslua/status/2102087511367618942

outside1234today at 7:42 PM

Who uses this trash?

show 1 reply
BoumTACtoday at 6:01 PM

Vals AI just affirm that Grok 4.7 is worse than Grok 4.6 (It ranks #24 on the Vals Index at 54.2%, down 5.0 points from Grok 4.6 (#14, 59.2%))

https://x.com/ValsAI/status/2102086608476590432

show 1 reply
finnjohnsen2today at 8:25 PM

Is Grok relevant? Who uses it?

Maybe I'm in some kind of bouble but I have never met or talked to anyone who has used Grok.

show 3 replies
zug_zugtoday at 4:57 PM

Well I "tried it out" I asked it one question, and it gave no answer and said "Sign up to use more!" I don't think I'll be doing that, no.

I can't think of a single dimension grok is winning on (capability, cost, voice), but want to stay open-minded -- anybody want to vouch for its capabilities in any domain?

show 4 replies