logoalt Hacker News

Facebook Pages require paid subscription to post more than two links per month

392 points • by AshleysBrain • today at 3:06 PM • 351 comments • view on HN

Comments

VCFundedGenYer • today at 5:05 PM

This will kill most of Facebook.

So many pages link out to other things, including major news sites.

This will either get reverted or Facebook will die. Mark's choice.

seydor • today at 4:27 PM

You either get stuck into facebook's tight grip on people's perpetual brain rot, or in google/apple's notification gardens. Welcome to the free and open internet.

f311a • today at 3:51 PM

In think in the future, they will charge users for posting anything more than x times a months.

Generating slop content is cheap now, but you need to store it and very few people will see it, so you can't show more ads.

insane_dreamer • today at 4:50 PM

Is Facebook even relevant anymore?

philipwhiuk • today at 4:12 PM

This is to get sites that monetize Facebook as a funnel to pay.

tsunamifury • today at 4:04 PM

This is a bi-directional play. For the vast majority that dont, this is an attempt to get more content INSIDE the facebook ecosystem as a moat, and for those that need outside content links they will pay since its a organic premium conversion.

Not defending it, just explaining the logic and why it might work even if it seems superficially stupid.

troyvit • today at 4:26 PM

I keep getting this feeling that we're in late-stage capitalism because of how all the oligarchs are maximizing extraction:

* Facebook with this and its new scraping rules for business accounts

* Turning Venezuela into a fiefdom

* Skydance merger

and on and on. But it's not late stage. It's just capitalism and we'll be reading about the same behavior 10 years from now.

➕ show 1 reply
Cort3z • today at 5:01 PM

Isn’t this good news? I imagine a lot of misinformation and phishing will become difficult.

noobcoder • today at 4:53 PM

this will just kill genuine posting, your favorite pages will stop sharing and your feed will drown in even more AI slop

I barely use fb as it is and this will just drive me off the platform entirely

wg0 • today at 3:35 PM

This is last stage capitalism of these tech platforms.

Nothing much left to innovate.

ChrisArchitect • today at 3:10 PM

late 2025: Facebook tests £9.99 monthly subscription for sharing more than two links https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46314668

➕ show 1 reply
sergiotapia • today at 3:51 PM

They are in the squeezing what's left position for that platform. Young kids think of facebook like we think of myspace. Social media as a platform in fact may just be over. my kids don't really use social media, they use whatsapp/iphone groups.

in fact... maybe kids think of instagram as a boomer unc platform now too.

➕ show 1 reply
partiallypro • today at 5:29 PM

I could understand this for new pages, to crack down on spam, but for established pages? It makes no sense at all. As a cash grab, I get it, but it's not sustainable. Though maybe they are trying to crack down on pages taking over feeds, which I would support...but that would also require them cracking down on the AI slop pictures, etc in feeds.

rambojohnson • today at 8:00 PM

dogshit platform.

apt-get • today at 3:38 PM

World Wide Web, huh?

Those hyperlinks ain't free, you know.

➕ show 3 replies
alex1138 • today at 4:29 PM

So... what

We have the internet and that's not good enough

You already throttle posts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14147719

You already act as a piss-poor communications medium https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4151433, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6090712

Is "Metaverse" open web/open protocol? Or just yet another way for Zuckerberg to fuck people over?

micromacrofoot • today at 4:06 PM

Can we just stop using Facebook as a defacto business/organizational page? come on people. I've been login-gated from what should be public pages for the better part of a decade now.

➕ show 1 reply
devilfileprong • today at 5:24 PM

[flagged]

EtienneDeLyon • today at 5:39 PM

[dead]

git-nebulous • today at 3:36 PM

[dead]

jheriko • today at 3:52 PM

[dead]

superkuh • today at 3:19 PM

On Google's Youtube to post links (like in video descriptions, etc) you have to pay by adding sellable/monetarily valuable personally identifying information to your account like a phone number and ID. Otherwise even with a google account from 2006 in good standing you can't post links anymore. Attempts to edit old video descriptions with HTTP/S links (from before the policy) also don't work.

➕ show 2 replies
dtdynasty • today at 4:05 PM

Seems like an anti spam measure. Bad actors ruin all features where links can be placed in front of eyes.

➕ show 1 reply