> They also get that way by inheriting wealth,

Then their parents must have been billionaires, generating it with investments. If the inheritors divest from those investments, then they incur enormous income taxes. So it's likely to stay.

> by buying favorable laws and regulations,

Then it's not free market. There is no government system that is immune from buying influence and corruption.

> by anticompetitive practices (we've seen a few in the IT sector), and by other problematic behavior.

Nothing is perfect.

> The conversation would be much more interesting if it was about the nuances.

Perhaps, but nuances do not drive prosperity. It would also be more interesting if you showed me a prosperous socialist economy.