> it does exist in pure html [...] JavaScript with WebComponents
You seem to have a rather original definition of "pure HTML".
Typo, from the numerous fat finger typos you see above. :)
An html only option that exists is using object. Replying to the miss of the OP in case others might find it suitable.
If a tiny bit of vanilla JavaScript can be tolerated, WebComponents appear to have a broad standardized approach that is not framework dependant.
Typo, from the numerous fat finger typos you see above. :)
An html only option that exists is using object. Replying to the miss of the OP in case others might find it suitable.
If a tiny bit of vanilla JavaScript can be tolerated, WebComponents appear to have a broad standardized approach that is not framework dependant.