logoalt Hacker News

MangoToupeyesterday at 8:16 PM3 repliesview on HN

I don't really consider it to be slow at all. It seems about as performant as any other language this complexity, and it's far faster than the 15 minute C++ and Scala build times I'd place in the same category.


Replies

mountainrivertoday at 3:07 AM

I also don’t understand this, the rust compiler hardly bothers me at all when I’m working. I feel like this is due to how bad it was early on and people just sticking to that narrative

BanterTroubletoday at 12:42 PM

The memory usage is quite large compared to C/C++ when compiling. I use Virtual Machines for Demos on my YouTube Channel and compiling something large in Rust requires 8GB+.

In C/C++ I don't even have to worry about it.

show 2 replies
randomNumber7yesterday at 10:07 PM

When C++ templates are turing complete is it pointless to complain about the compile times without considering the actual code :)