logoalt Hacker News

pu_petoday at 7:01 AM7 repliesview on HN

It sounds like a good idea, but I can imagine the implementation can be quite difficult. If I look exactly like another person, who has the right to decide what I can do with my own image?


Replies

Propellonitoday at 7:44 AM

Person A will have the rights to their image, person B to theirs. If person A looks like person B, person B still has no say in what person A does with their image and vice versa. Seems obvious to me.

I guess you worry about stuff like person A looks like celebrity person B and sells their image for, say, frosty frootloop commercials. As long as A is not impersonating B, ie. claiming to be B, I can't see a problem. "Hi, my name is Troy McClure, you may know me for looking like Serena Williams." I guess it will be the decade of the doppelgänger agencies, like in Double Trouble ;) [1]

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087481/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_1_tt_8...

medstromtoday at 7:15 AM

I imagine both of you would have the power to license out your likeness.

Same situation as today: if you have a lookalike out there who does pornography, and somebody you know runs across it, they'll think it's you and not much you can do about that except explain.

show 1 reply
HPsquaredtoday at 7:07 AM

The same problem applies to regular copyright. Different people will make similar, maybe even identical, works fairly often. So probably a similar solution? Not sure. The wrinkle being you can't exactly change your own features.

show 1 reply
zakkitoday at 7:03 AM

There is always outlier (i look like someone) in anything. However this universal approach is a win for the people.

wiseowisetoday at 7:12 AM

It works both ways. You’d have to find compromise.

paganeltoday at 9:43 AM

The State does. The same State which now has an extra-power over its subjects.

gambitingtoday at 7:25 AM

Unfortunately, the law is already quite stupid around this.

There have been many cases where a company wanted to hire say, actor X to voice their commercial, actor refused, so they hired someone else with a nearly identical voice, the original actor sued and won(!!!!!) because apparently it's their "signature" voice.

I disagree because obviously that means the other person has no right to make money using their voice now, at no fault of their own?

But yeah I'd imagine you'd have the same problem here - you can't generate a picture of say, Brad Pitt even if you say well actually this isn't Brad Pitt, it's just a person who happens to look exactly like him(which is obviously entirely possible and could happen).

show 2 replies