That’s one hell of a headline for a story about Meta winning summary judgement for most of the claims against them. You’d be forgiven for thinking Meta lost this case, going by the headline.
It's not a story about Meta winning (that previous story is linked in the first sentence), but a story expanding on the part where they didn't. The headline is totally appropriate for that piece.
It's not a story about Meta winning (that previous story is linked in the first sentence), but a story expanding on the part where they didn't. The headline is totally appropriate for that piece.