I don't see this, since the complaint is about things that used to work and not things that are still missing.

While that would perhaps be the best solution in the long run, wouldn't you agree that gains in userbase necessary for growth (or at least sustainability) are predicated upon how good the UX is _currently_ ?

I can't tell if this comment was written in jest or not.

It's always protocol improvements and 'it's coming in the next version's or 'msc #xxxx just got approved' with Matrix.

It's always someone saying 'oh this next version fixed all that' and then someone says 'well what about mobile' or 'what about desktop's and then someone says 'actually it doesn't fix it there.'

I'd love matrix to be the solution to my communication problems but it just isn't.