As long as the government only tazes your dogs and ruins your business, you can't even sue against the law even on constitutional grounds.

See Knife Rights V Garland. []

No one had been convicted in the past 10 years for violating the switchblade act, so the state ruled the law couldn't be challenged ("no standing"), even though it was actively being used to ruin people's businesses and raid their homes (the government would just give everything back a few years after doing so and not go through with charges).

[] https://kniferights.org/legislative-update/court-opines-feds...