logoalt Hacker News

cramcgrabyesterday at 6:37 PM2 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

kulahanyesterday at 6:37 PM

It's not. Not only is it a completely negligible amount (~one 50-gallon barrel per reactor per year), it's easy to store (literally kitty litter) and can be re-enriched (renewable).

show 4 replies
exabrialyesterday at 7:12 PM

A single swimming pool in the middle of nowhere is sufficient to store civilian nuclear waste.

You are likely conflating this with weapons programs.