logoalt Hacker News

medlazikyesterday at 7:22 PM5 repliesview on HN

>What do you mean?

I mean it's not clean

>one of the lowest impact mining of resources we have

Not the point. It's not clean, it shouldn't be called clean end of the story.


Replies

mpweiheryesterday at 8:41 PM

Nuclear power uses around 1/10th the resources of intermittent renewables per kWh of electricity produced.

So if nuclear isn't clean, renewables are downright filthy.

acidburnNSAyesterday at 7:34 PM

Ok, well by this definition, all human development activity is unclean. This is a perfectly valid point of view but is pretty distinct from the modern definition of clean.

show 1 reply
stonemetal12yesterday at 7:44 PM

Then what is clean? By that definition Solar and Wind aren't because copper and iron mines aren't clean.

show 1 reply
IAmBroomyesterday at 7:34 PM

Are you saying it's less clean than mining for the materials that make up solar panels and wind turbines?

alexey-salminyesterday at 7:32 PM

Do you think rare earth minerals for batteries and photovoltaics grow on trees?

show 2 replies