logoalt Hacker News

pessimizertoday at 4:25 AM1 replyview on HN

The extortion was to get them to contribute or pay somebody to contribute. And the threat was to withdraw his own resources.


Replies

graemetoday at 4:50 AM

The threat was to "go nuclear". Among other things

* Start a smear campaign

* block people from wordpress.org unless they ticked a loyalty checkbox stating they weren't affiliated with wpengine

* Take over and null Advanced Custom Fields, a WPengine plugin

* Block wpengine from wordpress.org, which is baked into wordpress, refuse to name a price for access, refuse to allow development of any alternate plugin hosting system

* Ban wordpress.org accounts of anyone who spoke up in favour of wpengine

* Start specific campaigns to poach wpengine clients

* start a website listing the staging urls of all wpengine customers and cite which ones left wpengine

I'm sure I've forgotten some things. The deal with extortion is you may have a legal ability to request money you are not legally entitled to. You may have a legal ability to take certain actions. But what is often not legal is threatening to take certain otherwise legal actions UNLESS you are paid money you are not legally entitled to.

The extortion claim was dismissed as the judge found there's no civil extortion tort under California law. California prosecutors haven't seen fit to file charges, so no formal proceeding.

But you're being rather blithe in your description.

show 1 reply