Agreed, it was just important to me to point it out, since staying within such a massive budget on such a long timeline is a rare achievement.
Considering the original title is just the name of the railway, and I do not think “within budget” is editorializing, I think the commenter is being overly pedantic
You're using a strange definition of "within". It's 7% over.
Considering the original title is just the name of the railway, and I do not think “within budget” is editorializing, I think the commenter is being overly pedantic