logoalt Hacker News

rangestransformtoday at 2:14 AM5 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

JasonADrurytoday at 6:16 AM

I don't think this is true. It's probably true that there's a pervasive belief that a hungry person probably shouldn't be punished for stealing food.

Other kinds of property crime? The costs of enforcement are high compared to the losses caused by individual cases, prioritization is understandably a difficult problem to solve.

show 2 replies
nirvdrumtoday at 2:26 AM

My experience with small police departments in the US is that they either don’t have the time or the inclination to deal with small property claims. If you’re a business they’ll be there in 10 minutes, but individuals aren’t afforded the same courtesy. Eventually, citizens realize it’s just not worth the cost or the hassle to report a crime unless it helps with an insurance claim.

show 1 reply
GoatInGreytoday at 2:21 AM

I believe there to be some merit to the notion that it is better for society if many of the generational cycles which lead to crime are broken. Sometimes that involves off-ramps from the road to incarceration.

That said, the policy can be, and certainly is, applied in imbalanced ways when justice is pursued over pragmatism.

show 1 reply
fuzzer371today at 2:26 AM

That belief is not shared by law enforcement. But all the same, they'll refuse to help you anyway.

mock-possumtoday at 6:31 AM

Bullshit.