logoalt Hacker News

user3939382today at 1:24 PM1 replyview on HN

You hedge this risk by migrating non AI workloads to new architectures that need 80% less energy. You don’t need TSMC chips. AI arch itself is also weak right now. It can be refactored to work distributed and with much more reasoning power on much less hardware.

Basically the current stack is primitive, so we waste 80% of the juice and then worry about how to power our inefficient mess. That’s the wrong set of questions.

No one will listen to me until I build it myself because everyone thinks they know everything.


Replies

danw1979today at 4:33 PM

I was thinking exactly this. The TSMC brake can only be a good thing if it constrains capacity on a wasteful industry and encourages research into efficiency.

If it also diverts workloads away from LLMs that we all know really belong elsewhere, more’s the better.