logoalt Hacker News

trash_catyesterday at 6:15 PM2 repliesview on HN

I think the naming schemes are quite arbitrary at this point. Going to 5 would come with massive expectations that wouldn't meet reality.


Replies

mrandishyesterday at 6:31 PM

After the negative reactions to GPT 5, we may see model versioning that asymptotically approaches the next whole number without ever reaching it. "New for 2030: Claude 4.9.2!"

show 1 reply
Squarexyesterday at 6:38 PM

the standard used to be that major version means a new base model / full retrain... but now it is arbitrary i guess