For the AI skeptics reading this, there is an overwhelming probability that Mitchell is a better developer than you. If he gets value out of these tools you should think about why you can't.
I'm not as good as Fabrice Bellard either but I don't let that bother me as I go about my day.
Perhaps that's the reason. Maybe I'm just not a good enough developer. But that's still not actionable. It's not like I never considered being a better developer.
Don't get it. What's the relation between Mitchell being a "better" developer than most of us (and better is always relative, but that's another story) and getting value out of AI? That's like saying Bezos is a way better businessman than you, so you should really hear his tips about becoming a billionaire. No sense (because what works for him probably doesn't work for you)
Tons of respect for Mitchell. I think you are doing him a disservice with these kinds of comments.
"Why can't you be more like your brother Mitchell?"
The AI skeptics instead stick to hard data, which so far shows a 19% reduction in productivity when using AI.