logoalt Hacker News

chihuahuayesterday at 5:42 AM2 repliesview on HN

The scheme to damage hardware or data when Prolok Plus thinks someone's using a pirated copy seems ludicrous. Who wants to deal with the liability when this goes wrong due to a bug or unexpected circumstances?


Replies

tgsovlerkhgselyesterday at 11:02 AM

"Bright" ideas were and always will be a thing in copy protection mechanisms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootk... for a much newer example, albeit non-destructive. I vaguely remember some much more recent destructive examples, not sure if implemented or threatened, but I might be confusing things.

Edit: Found the incident I was thinking about using Gemini. A flight sim addon company FSLabs shipped malware with their installer. It didn't wipe data, it stole your Chrome password manager instead. https://www.reddit.com/r/flightsim/comments/xa58qz/a_retrosp... is a reddit summary, https://forums.flightsimlabs.com/index.php?%2Fannouncement%2... the company explaining/justifying what they did and why (TL;DR it was meant to be a targeted attack against some specific pirates).

show 1 reply
charcircuityesterday at 6:44 AM

It seems like it only deletes pirated software. It is hard to understand what they actually claimed it to do without there being an actual source.