No where in the comment do they assert they are work for Microsoft.
This is a peer-review.
Let's just say they are pretending to be helpful, how about that?
> "Peer review"
no unless your "peers" are bots who regurgitate LLM slop.
It's performative garbage: authority roleplay edition.
Let me slop an affirmative comment on this HIGH TRAFFIC issue so I get ENGAGEMENT on it and EYEBALLS on my vibed GitHub PROFILE and get STARS on my repos.
It's not a peer review it's just AI slop. I do agree they don't seem to be intentionally posing as an MS employee.