logoalt Hacker News

bri3dyesterday at 8:58 PM1 replyview on HN

What if my threat model is "compromised the disk imaging / disk supply chain?" This is a plausible and real threat model, and represents a moderate erosion, like I said.

UEFI Secure Boot is also just not a meaningful countermeasure to anyone with even a moderate paranoia level anyway, so it's all just goofing around at this point from a security standpoint. All of these "add more nag screens for freedom" measures like the grandparent post and yours don't really seem useful to me, though.


Replies

fc417fc802today at 2:23 AM

> UEFI Secure Boot is also just not a meaningful countermeasure to anyone with even a moderate paranoia level

Baseless FUD. If you have an actual point to make then do so.

> All of these "add more nag screens for freedom"

No one said anything about a nag screen. You literally just made that up.

For the record google pixels work largely this way. Flash image, test boot, re-lock bootloader.

show 1 reply