logoalt Hacker News

xphoslast Sunday at 11:44 PM5 repliesview on HN

Well x86 at one point, arm both the 32 and 64 bit versions. I think they had RISCV support in their source tree at one point but not really at a commercial level. It does cover a lot different levels of hardware though


Replies

skissaneyesterday at 5:00 AM

Does Apple use macOS in servers in its datacentres? Or are they all Linux?

Surely at a minimum they need macOS for CI.

Apple does have one advantage here-they can legally grant themselves permission to run macOS internally on non-Apple hardware, and I don’t believe doing so legally obliges them to extend the same allowance to their customers.

But that might give them a reason to keep x86_64 alive for internal use, since that platform (still) gives you more options for server-class hardware than ARM does

show 2 replies
wimlyesterday at 12:39 AM

PPC32/64 of course, and for a long time Darwin still contained remnants of its predecessor's support for SPARC, PA-RISC, and m68k.

userbinatoryesterday at 4:43 AM

Which Apple products run arm32 XNU? Their first Apple Silicon CPUs were already arm64.

show 2 replies
kjs3yesterday at 1:06 AM

Is mc68k or PPC still in there anywhere?

show 1 reply