logoalt Hacker News

tapoxiyesterday at 4:16 PM10 repliesview on HN

Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?


Replies

dsagentyesterday at 4:18 PM

We're starting to have that convo in our org. This is just getting worse and worse for Github.

Hosting .git is not that complicated of a problem in isolation.

bigfishrunningyesterday at 4:36 PM

No, but it has momentum left over from when it was much better. The Microsoft downslide will continue untill there's no one left

shimmanyesterday at 7:34 PM

Yes, for personal projects I just self-host an instance of forgejo with dokploy. Everything else I deploy on codeberg, which is also an instance of forgejo.

jeltzyesterday at 4:58 PM

Not any longer. It used to but the outages have become very common. I am thinking about moving all my personal stuff to Codeberg.

azangruyesterday at 5:01 PM

I love its UI (apart from its slowness, of course). I find it much cleaner than Gitlab's.

vvilliamperezyesterday at 4:20 PM

You can self-host GitHub enterprise.

show 1 reply
tacker2000yesterday at 4:42 PM

Im using Bitbucket for years with no issues.

show 1 reply
rifficyesterday at 4:18 PM

self-host your own services. There are a lot of alternatives to GitHub.

rvzyesterday at 5:21 PM

It always has been to just self host. Predicted GitHub's outage streak as far back as half a decade ago [0].

"A better way is to self host". [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803