logoalt Hacker News

jfengelyesterday at 9:53 PM1 replyview on HN

The math is hard, but I don't think that's the problem. Hard math eventually succumbs.

I think that even if AI were to find a good unification of GR and QM, we wouldn't be able to test it. We might accept it without additional confirmation if it were sufficiently natural-feeling (the way we accepted Newtonian gravity long before we could measure G), but there's no guarantee that we'd ever be able to meaningfully test it.

We could get lucky -- such a theory might point at a solution to some of the few loose threads we get out of existing collider and cosmological measurements -- but we might not. We could be stuck wishing we had a galaxy-sized collider.


Replies

tim333yesterday at 10:33 PM

It might explain some of the many physics observations that we don't have explanations for like why do we have the particles we have and why those properties.