logoalt Hacker News

eaferyesterday at 3:33 PM5 repliesview on HN

I wonder how well Sagan's own "baloney" holds up against his kit. Historians despise the guy for all the stuff he made up about the library of Alexandria, Hypatia, Eratosthenes, etc... People still repeat a lot of that to this day.


Replies

RichardCAyesterday at 6:14 PM

Sagan made solid contributions to Planetary Science in the 60's and 70's.

His role as PBS educator, SF author, etc. needs to be considered as a separate thing.

I also loved James Burke and his Connections series, but as it got into the later seasons the so-called "connections" got tenuous and sometimes quite strained.

You can go through all the classic PBS science shows and find problems, Stephen Hawking's Universe was basically unwatchable because they refused to engage with the math.

show 1 reply
BeetleByesterday at 7:02 PM

Did he make the stuff up, or did he get them from (now considered) poor sources?

show 1 reply
eaferyesterday at 4:37 PM

I just found out that his story about the Heike Crabs is also complete baloney. That makes me sad, it was really such a great story.

palmoteayesterday at 5:56 PM

> I wonder how well Sagan's own "baloney" holds up against his kit. Historians despise the guy for all the stuff he made up about the library of Alexandria, Hypatia, Eratosthenes, etc... People still repeat a lot of that to this day.

Yeah, but he's a saint of science-fandom, so don't question him. Instead, admire and follow him, and encourage others to do likewise.

SoftTalkeryesterday at 6:06 PM

I loved watching Cosmos when I was a kid but as I got older I developed a dislike for Sagan. He strikes me as supremely arrogant and probably insufferable to be around. I don't know that of course, I never met him. Just a feeling.