logoalt Hacker News

jhbadgeryesterday at 10:39 AM5 repliesview on HN

I think it is pretty unreasonable to call CP/M "primitive beyond belief". It was basically equivalent to MS-DOS in capability -- after all, MS-DOS was basically an unlicensed clone of CP/M for the 8086.


Replies

zozbot234yesterday at 2:49 PM

> It was basically equivalent to MS-DOS in capability

MS-DOS 2.0 was a huge improvement, the first release didn't even support subdirectories or hard drives.

loloquwowndueoyesterday at 3:09 PM

Ms-dos was primitive beyond belief. Barely more than a program loader.

andylynchyesterday at 11:07 AM

It is said be way of comparison to modern platforms. Which seems pretty accurate.

whobreyesterday at 1:40 PM

> after all, MS-DOS was basically an unlicensed clone of CP/M for the 8086.

Eh, not really. The file system was very different and these early operating systems were mostly a file system. The system calls were almost identical…

andrewstuartyesterday at 10:51 AM

Yes. Primitive behind belief.

There was a time in the world when most PC users could drive the C prompt.

show 1 reply