logoalt Hacker News

randallsquaredyesterday at 5:20 PM1 replyview on HN

The "victim" was the Elixir or Erlang library, not himself. To be clear.


Replies

move-on-byyesterday at 8:00 PM

I don’t think it was clear, but thanks for the insight.

Was WolfSSL forced upon Elixir or Erlang? Did they purchase it and received a defective product? Are they held hostage by WolfSSL’s decisions? Are they not allowed to modify WolfSSL as needed themselves?

I fail to see any victims beyond perhaps the WolfSSL maintainers for having to suffer such entitlement.