logoalt Hacker News

GaggiXyesterday at 7:37 PM1 replyview on HN

>These tools are not perfect, but they're right more often than they're wrong.

Based on what in particular? The only time I have used them is to have a laugh.


Replies

lich_kingyesterday at 7:42 PM

Based on experience, including a good number of experiments I've done with known-LLM output and contemporary, known-human text. Try them for real and be surprised. Some of the good, state-of-the-art tools include originality.ai and Pangram.

A lot of people on HN have preconceived notions here based on stories they read about someone being unfairly accused of plagiarism or people deliberately triggering failure modes in these programs, and that's basically like dismissing the potential of LLMs because you read they suggested putting glue on a pizza once.

show 1 reply