logoalt Hacker News

cm2012yesterday at 7:19 PM6 repliesview on HN

Essentially: unsold clothing is worth less than zero and recycling most clothing creates more emissions than it saves. So the law is forcing headache for nothing.


Replies

teraflopyesterday at 7:28 PM

If companies are taking raw materials worth more than zero, and turning them into clothing worth less than zero, then I think deterring them from doing that is beneficial to society overall.

show 2 replies
zos_kiayesterday at 7:59 PM

The worth is zero because the producer doesn't pay for the externalities (pollution, landfill usage etc). So essentially it is "free" because it is subsidized by everyone.

The "headache" is just : produce what you sell, sell what you produce, don't fill the world with your shit.

show 1 reply
binarymaxyesterday at 7:27 PM

Or rather, since we know fast fashion is horrible because of the things you just said - it forces a more thoughtful approach to production.

cm2012yesterday at 10:59 PM

Also: this will lead to it being harder to find clothing in your size in the EU (since each size is a new sku and must be inventory managed per the law)

ninalanyonyesterday at 7:31 PM

If the headache causes companies to improve their product pipelines so that there is less waste then surely there will be less recycling.

vanviegenyesterday at 7:28 PM

Discouraging superfluous production is not nothing.