logoalt Hacker News

fleshmonadyesterday at 12:16 PM5 repliesview on HN

Vim is my only text editor, I use it for writing everything. Emails, scripts, messages, 100k+ lines codebases, prose, never needed this plugin. One line for 80 char wrap on certain filetypes, and a that is it, never needed such a plugin.

For prose, you can simply hard wrap at 80 (arguably you should), and vim supports this via a single config line. OOTB vim soft breaks anyway and you can navigate between in those broken lines via gj, gk etc.

Seems like bloat to me.


Replies

criddellyesterday at 2:32 PM

I'm your opposite. I use Pages for letter writing, Word for documentation, PyCharm for Python, Visual Studio for C++, VSCode for Javascript, Outlook for email, vi for bash and config files, SublimeText for markdown and html, OneNote for todos and project planning, Obsidian for my work log and outlines, the Notes app for on-the-go capture, etc...

show 1 reply
1vuio0pswjnm7yesterday at 6:53 PM

Seems like bloat to me, too

I prefer writing with a mechanical pencil

For editing text on a screen, I prefer UNIX utilities ed, sed, ex/vi and custom filters written in C. The later can be used within ed or ex/vi via

   :!filter
The slow, error-prone step is getting the text _accurately_ from the paper to bits in the computer. A personalised OCR that can recognise own handwriting might be helpful
Roundish7334yesterday at 12:33 PM

I agree - sometimes it is too easy to get lost when people create plugins for simple configuration options that are already built-in.

cryptonectoryesterday at 4:23 PM

Yes, this. Vim needs no plugins for writing prose.

CamTyesterday at 12:49 PM

I feel similarly, but I could see folks who use vim as more of an IDE finding this useful.