alt Hacker NewsActually it works the other way. With multiple agents they can often correct each others mistaken assumptions. Part of the value of this approach is precisely that you do get better results with fewer hallucinated assumptions.
Still makes this change from Anthropic stupid.
Replies
groundzeros2015 • yesterday at 2:37 PM
Nonsense. If you have 16 binary decisions that’s 64k possible paths.
➕ show 1 reply
The corrective agent has the exact same percentage chance at making the mistake. "Correcting" an assumption that was previously correct into an incorrect one.
If a singular agent has a 1% chance of making an incorrect assumption, then 10 agents have that same 1% chance in aggregate.