logoalt Hacker News

throw7yesterday at 5:46 PM3 repliesview on HN

[flagged]


Replies

nkozyrayesterday at 5:52 PM

> The change here is that late night interviews are not "bona fied news"

Not always the case with Section 315, and late night and talk shows have been exempted in the past. The problem here is that this is on a case-by-case basis, and we have a particularly politically-charged executive agency.

Larrikinyesterday at 5:56 PM

They cite that this goes against the long standing rule and they cite the selective enforcement against Colbert and Kimmel before the interview. Two people the president has directly attacked.

They also cite that they have elected to not enforce the rule against conservative radio hosts.

tclancyyesterday at 5:52 PM

>The change here is that late night interviews are not "bona fied news" so equal time rule kicks in

I'll give you "fear" is the wrong word for a company openly courting the administration, but if the equal time clause applies here because CBS is over-the-air using "a public good", it feels like we're long past a time where it should apply to _at least_ cable stations. Ideally, the whole thing would be put back in place how it was before the Regan or Rush Limbaugh era decimation of it (IIRC), but with the net and podcasts and youtube, et al, this is just me getting old and seeing some weird value in locking the splinters of the barn door.