logoalt Hacker News

gdiamosyesterday at 7:07 AM2 repliesview on HN

I remember it differently. CUDA was built with the intention of finding/enabling something like deep learning. I thought it was unrealistic too and took it on faith in people more experienced than me, until I saw deep learning work.

Some of the near misses I remember included bitcoin. Many of the other attempts didn't ever see the light of day.

Luck in english often means success by chance rather than one's own efforts or abilities. I don't think that characterizes CUDA. I think it was eventual success in the face of extreme difficulty, many failures, and sacrifices. In hindsight, I'm still surprised that Jensen kept funding it as long as he did. I've never met a leader since who I think would have done that.


Replies

cherryteastainyesterday at 8:25 AM

Nobody cared about deep learning back in 2007, when CUDA released. It wasn't until the 2012 AlexNet milestone that deep neural nets start to become en vogue again.

show 1 reply
fooblasteryesterday at 8:38 PM

CUDA was profitable very early because of oil and gas code, like reverse time migration and the like. There was no act of incredible foresight from jensen. In fact, I recall him threatening to kill the program if large projects that made it not profitable failed, like the Titan super computer at oak ridge.