logoalt Hacker News

some-guytoday at 2:15 AM3 repliesview on HN

> Yes, while I use Fedora on my laptop, I also know Fedora is generally not a good option for a server.

Why is Fedora not considered good for a server?


Replies

neelctoday at 2:22 AM

It's a cutting-edge distro with 6-month release and 13-month support cycles.

Whereas Debian/Ubuntu have 5 years and RHEL/Alma/Rocky have 10 years.

show 1 reply
INTPenistoday at 8:39 AM

It's more maintenance due to its frequent release cycles, but it's perfectly good as a server OS. I've used it many times, friends use it.

You can't mess up the release cycle because their package repos drop old releases very quickly, so you're left stranded.

A friend recently converted his Fedora servers to RHEL10 because he has kids now and just doesn't have the time for the release cycle. So RHEL, or Debian, Alma, Rocky, offer a lot more stability and less maintenance requirement for people who have a life.

zuntaruktoday at 3:01 AM

I'd also love to hear what folks have to say about this.

For myself I've had nothing but positive experiences running Fedora on my servers.

show 1 reply