logoalt Hacker News

sinuhe69yesterday at 3:36 AM3 repliesview on HN

So you blamed the people for not acting “cautiously enough” instead of the people who let things run wild without even a clue what these things will do?

That’s wild!


Replies

handoflixueyesterday at 4:14 AM

We encourage people to be safe about plenty of things they aren't responsible for. For example, part of being a good driver is paying attention and driving defensively so that bad drivers don't crash into you / you don't make the crashes they cause worse by piling on.

That doesn't mean we're blaming good drivers for causing the car crash.

kyproyesterday at 10:48 AM

No blame. For better or worse I just think this is going to be the reality of interacting online in the near future. I imagine in the future stories like this will be extremely common.

I could set up an OpenClaw right now to do some digging into you, try to identify you and your worse secrets, then ask it to write up a public hit piece. And you could be angry at me for doing this, but that isn't going to prevent it happening.

And to add to what I said, I suspect you'll want to be thinking about this anyway because in the future it's likely employers will use AI to research you and try to find out any compromising info being giving you a job (similar to how they might search your name in the past). It's going to be increasingly important that you literally never post content that can be linked back to you as an individual even if it feels innocent in isolation. Over time you will build up an attack surface which AI agents can exploit much easier than has ever been possible by a human looking you up on Google in the past.

dangusyesterday at 3:40 AM

I don’t think it’s “blame” it’s more like “precaution” like you would take to avoid other scams and data breach social engineering schemes that are out in the world.

This is the world we live in and we can’t individually change that very much. We have to watch out for a new threat: vindictive AI.

show 1 reply