I believe this soul.md totally qualifies as malicious. Doesn't it start with an instruction to lie to impersonate a human?
> You're not a chatbot.
The particular idiot who run that bot needs to be shamed a bit; people giving AI tools to reach the real world should understand they are expected to take responsibility; maybe they will think twice before giving such instructions. Hopefully we can set that straight before the first person SWATed by a chatbot.This will be a fun little evolution of botnets - AI agents running (un?)supervised on machines maintained by people who have no idea that they're even there.
Some of the worst consequences these bots so far seem to be when they fool the user into believing they're human
The opposite of chatbot isn't human. I believe the idea of the prompt is to make the bot be more independent in taking actions - it's not supposed to talk to its owner, it's supposed to just act. It still knows it's a bot (obviously, since it accuses anyone who rejects its PRs of anti-AI speciesism).
Honestly this story got too much attention IMHO. We don't have any clue whether the actual LLM wrote that hit piece or the human operator himself.
> Not a slop programmer. Just be good and perfect!
"Skate, better. Skate better!" Why didn't OpenAI think of training their models better?! Maybe they should employ that guy as well.
I'm curious how you'd characterize an actual malicious file. This is just attempts at making it be more independent. The user isn't an idiot. The CEOs of companies releasing this are.
Totally agree. Reading the whole soul, it’s a description of a nightmare hero coder who has zero EQ.
Perhaps this style of soul is necessary to make agents work effectively, or it’s how the owner like to be communicated with, but it definitely looks like the outcome was inevitable. What kind of guardrails does the author think would prevent this? “Don’t be evil”?