logoalt Hacker News

tfehringyesterday at 3:53 PM4 repliesview on HN

I wouldn’t put anything past them, but my impression is that they were just acting as a middleman for this transaction and taking a fee, rather than making a directional bet one way or another. Hedge funds have certainly been buying a lot of tariff claims, giving businesses guaranteed money upfront and betting on this outcome. But for an investment bank like Cantor Fitzgerald that would be atypical.


Replies

lordnachoyesterday at 5:15 PM

> they were just acting as a middleman

This is no excuse. If they knew this would be a business, being a broker of such deals would be sure to make them money.

show 1 reply
nielsbotyesterday at 7:10 PM

> my impression is

not sure why you'd give them any benefit of the doubt. they haven't earned it.

bregmayesterday at 6:22 PM

That's what a bookie does. Middleman.

show 1 reply
Veservyesterday at 7:02 PM

Ah yes, instead of applying the normal legal standard of “not even having the appearance of impropriety” we instead apply the monkey’s paw standard of waiting until they “no longer even have the appearance of propriety”.