A lot more credible than archive.org that lets archives be changed and deleted by the archive targets.
What's your better idea?
Does archive.org really let its archives be changed? That's very different than letting them be deleted from a credibility perspective.
> the archive targets
Isn't there a substantial overlap with the copyright holders?
Does archive.org really let its archives be changed? That's very different than letting them be deleted from a credibility perspective.