> "Scaled Trunk-Based Development"
> There's nothing wrong with small, short-lived branches that can be quickly reviewed and merged into main.
I would have called this "branch based development", personally.
Hmm, branches you say? Branches that contain features?
https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/...
But yeah, that’s what people generally settled on, naming wise.
Hmm, branches you say? Branches that contain features?
https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/...
But yeah, that’s what people generally settled on, naming wise.