> I'd much rather reduce the risk of mutation to the trunk, by having small easily reviewable commits direct to trunk.
You're not addressing the problem. You're just wishing that the problem wouldn't happen as frequently as it does.
But that's like wishing that race conditions don't happen by making your allocations at a higher frequency.
I'm describing how Google works with teams with high release cadence, fwiw.
Also, your comment reads a little bit as a non sequitur.