logoalt Hacker News

PowerElectronixyesterday at 5:06 PM5 repliesview on HN

I personally fail to see the downside of any manufacturer selling forever at a loss, except for the manufacturer itself.


Replies

xyzzy123yesterday at 5:26 PM

You become dependent on the supplier.

The downside in general is that other countries lose production capacity in steel, heavy industry, semiconductors, machine tools etc - industries that took decades to build and can't be easily replaced.

Also they gradually lose the ability to meaningfully innovate in those sectors because there's no grounding against production reality anymore.

This has geopolitical consequences further down the line.

show 3 replies
skeeter2020yesterday at 10:10 PM

First, they're not selling at a loss; the huge price increases have allowed them to push aggrssively in the legacy markets. They're making "slightly smaller" profits than other manufacturers (of which there are now very few).

Second, they can drive out all competition and then have a captive audience for whatever prices they want, as the barriers to entry in these markets are very high. This is essentially what's happened with all higher-end manufacturing in the west over the past 30+ years.

creatoyesterday at 9:22 PM

If you actually believe this, then what is your explanation for a manufacturer to do this?

Do you think they are just stupid?

fphyesterday at 9:41 PM

Microsoft gave away Internet Explorer at a loss, and what happened to internet standards?

numpad0yesterday at 5:41 PM

the currency eventually collapses

show 1 reply