logoalt Hacker News

echelonlast Monday at 10:35 AM11 repliesview on HN

I really don't think so. I feel like we're at a takeoff.

Senior engineers using AI coding are 10x more productive. My output has jumped dramatically. I'm a senior engineer and built six nines, active-active systems that moved billions of dollars a day. I am absolutely a beast with these models. I can replace an entire team just by myself. I'm literally shipping an entire week of features in half a day. I'm reviewing the code and planning the architecture - I am not dialing this in.

Video editors using video models can replace entire studio production departments. Writer-directors who know how to direct are essentially now Hollywood studios in their own right. I know a lot about this in particular because I've been making films as a hobby for 15+ years and work with a lot of industry professionals.

You'll see a lot of slop, but that's the same thing we got when we gave the masses cell phones with cameras attached to them. We still have plenty of amazing photographers in the world, and the means of creation are only getting cheaper/easier and the scope of creation for any individual is growing and growing and growing.

This is the next industrial revolution.


Replies

sz4kertolast Monday at 10:41 AM

So prices will need to increase -- if it makes a senior engineer 10x more productive then coding assistants could easily cost 20x-100x more then what they cost today. Same for video generation.

show 1 reply
ndr42last Monday at 10:56 AM

If you are able now to create 10 products instead of 1 in the same time frame you will have to plan, review and maintain 10 things instead of 1. How can this work? I mean to double your productivity is a huge jump but 10x sounds unsustainable.

show 1 reply
iamtheworstdevlast Monday at 10:37 AM

Yea but are you paying a profitable amount of money to your service provider for you to do it? I find it hard to believe that Anthropic is profiting off of my $100/mo subscription based on how active I keep my machines running.

show 1 reply
lm28469last Monday at 11:13 AM

Do you get paid 10x? Does your company make 10x?

Nope, because the only companies making money on this bs are companies selling pickaxes and shovels

silver_silverlast Monday at 11:02 AM

The video models aren’t that good yet but for coding the utility is clear, yes. To be fair Darren Aronofsky also overestimates their quality.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but generating video is also much more resource intensive than equivalently productive text-only model use. It seems the industry could save itself a lot of hassle and infamy by simply avoiding artistic fields.

mirsadmlast Monday at 10:41 AM

This is yet to be seen. Certainly feels like I'm more productive but I'm not seeing any faster results. It would be nice for this to be studied more.

show 1 reply
joe_mambalast Monday at 10:37 AM

>Senior engineers using AI coding are 10x more productive.

Are the subscriptions of those engineers enough to make their use-case profitable and on top to also be subsidizing the cost of AI video slop generation and keep the company profitable?

>Video editors using video models can replace entire studio production departments.

Then why is OpenAI losing more an more money?

>This is the next industrial revolution.

I'm not saying it isn't, but we did have the .com bubble burst even though that was also revolution. Something can be a bubble and a revolution simultaneously. The internet didn't go away after the .com bubble burst, just the crazy speculations did, which is what I was saying will happen with the AI bauble. The bubble will burst and only the profit generating parts of AI will remain.

jbxntuehineohyesterday at 4:38 PM

> I'm thoroughly reviewing a week's worth of code in (less than) half a day

no you aren't lmfao

re-thclast Monday at 10:48 AM

> I can replace an entire team just by myself. I'm literally shipping an entire week of features in half a day. I'm reviewing the code and planning the architecture - I am not dialing this in.

So you can review so much code so fast? Are you sure?

In many companies code reviews (properly) are the bottleneck. This was the case without AI. Now you're saying AI is giving you 10x more code reviews and you're even faster.

What am I missing?

p.s. I agree AI can make you and things faster just not suddenly god mode.

show 1 reply
GlacierFoxlast Monday at 10:46 AM

Video editors using video models can replace entire studio production departments. Writer-directors who know how to direct are essentially now Hollywood studios in their own right. I know a lot about this in particular because I've been making films as a hobby for 15+ years and work with a lot of industry professionals.

This is soul destroying. Literally made my day worse thinking about this.

show 2 replies
throawayonthelast Monday at 10:44 AM

the dotcom bubble bursting didn't mean the internet wasn't an extremely valuable technology - still a bubble