alt Hacker NewsIf they're using their overwhelming size to lock out smaller competitors that can't put up a similar collateral?
Probably a good idea. And it looks like Netflix simply needed to make the service a bit more expensive?
If they're using their overwhelming size to lock out smaller competitors that can't put up a similar collateral?
Probably a good idea. And it looks like Netflix simply needed to make the service a bit more expensive?
A “bit” more expensive to cover $16 billion of expenses?
So how would that have helped smaller competitors? Where were they going to get the money from to compete if not other lines of businesses or borrowing? Were they going to charge their first 10,000 customers $100,000 a year so they could fund development without either borrowing money or take it from existing businesses?