logoalt Hacker News

dzinktoday at 4:17 AM3 repliesview on HN

This needs to include life-changing false positive rates. Imagine being given a diagnosis like this - people around you who know and any corporations who can sniff it out by snooping on your communications can lead to much rejection early in life. What happens when the diagnosis is as positive when it shouldn’t have been?


Replies

Aurornistoday at 4:50 AM

This isn't a predictive test that someone could take in early life.

It's used to refine clinical diagnosis after patients present with cognitive severe decline.

By the time someone gets this test, they have severe problems. The purpose of this test is to assist with the right diagnosis.

cpncrunchtoday at 4:20 AM

As per the article, the test is used in conjunction with clinical diagnosis, not instead of.

Mathnerd314today at 6:58 AM

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03622-w this is the paper they're basing the research on. So in primary care, the accuracy rates are in the 80s. So that's something like a 17% false positive rate. That's still like 5 to 1 odds of getting a correct result though. It's much better than nothing.